/retro/ - Y2K

>>193 (OP) 
Nice, I will check it out

Rupin.PNG
[Hide] (482.1KB, 636x474)

Jesus, I'm getting a headache looking at this.

How did you create the 3D text?

>>245
looks like word art.

ѝ20.jpg
[Hide] (25.2KB, 640x572)

>>193 (OP) 
neat. If you don't already use it. www.wiby.me is great as well. And what in sam hell is a mobile device? It works fine on my laptop, seems pretty "mobile" to me!

Looks cool and I like the idea but it's not really a webring, just a link list/directory. Webrings are when people add themselves to the "ring" and all link back (traditionally with a banner).

>>375
>And what in sam hell is a mobile device? It works fine on my laptop, seems pretty "mobile" to me!
Heh
>>379
Don't see a reason why "a simple list/directory" can't be considered a webring, I do recall seeing webring websites in the 90s that were just directories. Keep in mind that a "true" webring would require scripts and a database, and neither were that popular in the web 1.0 and 2.0 days.

Another anon made a neato webring in >>310

https://whimsical.club/
https://special.fish/
https://compos-mentis.neocities.org/
http://angusnicneven.com/
https://obscuritory.com/

1438670157592.png
[Hide] (150.6KB, 643x354)

>>193 (OP) 
>niggermania
kek

hannibal.jpg
[Hide] (402.3KB, 1000x667)

>>825
Baste.

>>818
I recognize 4 out of 5 of these. Gotta step my game up.

>>243
same, its the jews though

1322762145356.jpg
[Hide] (102.8KB, 720x960)

I like it, OP. But I feel your "old web" filter is not very on point. Perhaps it would be better using the term "simple web design"?

Missing post | No.549 | 02/29/2020 04:15:59

So is this for websites designed with old principles in mind or for actually old websites that are still up?

Missing post | No.550 | 02/29/2020 04:18:27

>>3753
It's for websites designed with old principles and it's very loose. Protonmail is there. Protonmail is typical modern web. Most websites there have "decent web design", for example https://www.gnu.org/ .

Missing post | No.551 | 02/29/2020 04:29:30