>>112617
Like all AI haters you don't even understand the current tech, or old techniques (actually drawing on paper). You conveniently didn't respond to the bit about using the eraser on paper.
>Why do you think schools (At least used to) be on people's ass about how they cannot use a calculator during math tests in elementary and middle school?
>he makes excuses for the factory "education" system
Lmao. I worked as a math tutor for many years and I can tell you, no amount of teaching and forcing can change a retard, doubly so if the retard doesn't care/want to learn it. At best you can temporarily teach them to follow some set of instructions, until they forget about it.
>Similar circumstances with the "Undo" function or even AI. How can you be a "skilled artist" if you constantly have to correct your "mistakes", especially in a medium where part of the appeal and process is making "happy little accidents"?
You're quoting a guy that made a living producing videos about essentially "vibe painting". When you have a specific vision, there's very few "happy little accidents", everything that strays from that vision is just an error, and that's it. That's why all the skilled artists, everywhere use erasers or the undo tool. The undo tool is essentially a streamlined eraser. and it HAS been widely adopted, for obvious reasons.
>How can you use AI to it's fullest extent unless you have the knowledge to correct where the errors exist?
People with shit taste and zero knowledge will continue to create shit things. I've met some people who mastered the art fundies but their taste was so abysmal they only created offensive garbage. They're just like tasteless prompters. Then there's people with both taste and skill, so just good artists. What AI actually changes is that people without the technical skill (shading, lineart, polishing the picture, etc etc) but with good taste can now create good pics.
Similar thing is game engines. Things like RPG maker has seen massive adoption by thousands, and many people who have very limited coding abilities made good games with it.
>Video games have been fucking around with the idea for years about procedural generation with a wide variety of genres, from exploration titles like Terraria to musical games like Audiosurf to gigantic games like No Man's Sky, but they all still suffer from the same problem that they're not as satisfying of an experience compared to something that's crafted from beginning to end.
>Man, walking in a natural forest sucks, I want to walk in a perfectly designed city, where every brick was consciously laid by someone
They provide fundamentally different experiences to static games. They're a different type of games. You're not proving anything. Well, maybe aside for your own lack of taste. That's probably why you don't get these new tools. That, or you're some anti-ai shill.
>Yeah, it's cool that you can put whatever text prompt you want into box and have it generate a decent image, but is that satisfying at the end of the day? Is that the goal you want to achieve?
And that's the nail in your coffin.
If your idea is "eh, just show me some cute anime girl"(you have zero taste), then its not satisfying. If you actually know what you want, specifically what you want(you actually have taste), then generating it is indeed satisfying.
>muh python, muh python
Who gives a shit retard, jesus christ. It works.
Just like Windows is awful, *but it just works*, unlike all the loonix distros where you have to tie yourself into knots to do basic things. I use linux as my main OS, but I don't tolerate this kind of software elitism, because its spouted by delusional retards that care about things that JUST. DON'T. MATTER.