>>1612
>Funny that you use a vague term like "affordability"
You know you've been deep in the neoliberal hole when "affordablity" is a vague term
>As people want bigger and better things in life.
I don't know what world you're living in, but things have not been getting "bigger and better"
>You mean the guy who went on stage and literally had a stroke?
Yup, and you're echoing his words
>What's the problem? Don't like having all that power over multi-billion dollar international companies?
Only a neoliberal shill would describe overpriced food as having power
>You mean like what they're doing in Europe, where their health care system has moved onto literally killing people to subsidize organ transplants and offload how many people receive health treatment to fix the bloated system?
Europe has it's own problems, and I can start a whole 'nother discussion about that. But Europe is ran by very similar neoliberals. And I've been through the American medical system, trust me, it's not as smooth as you think.
>Attempt to classify everything through a class warfare strategy is a stern indication that your making Woke talking points.
Ahahahahaha, you have no idea, do you?
>There is no other Socialism. Any system that starts adopting Socialist policies will ALWAYS go "full Socialist" as there is no other outcome when you begin taking away people's ability to be independent and self-motivated.
Roads, Fire Departments, Police Departments, Libraries, the Military