/robowaifu/ - DIY Robot Wives

petah_the_robowaifu_is_here.png
[Hide] (850.3KB, 2000x1125)

>>782 (OP) 
Two thoughts

-Could it follow narratives? If I showed it Family Guy, could it follow the story? Could it understand the joke where Peter uses a jetpack to cheat Dr. Hartman's weight check? Could it learn who Peter, Lois, Chris, Meg, Stewie, Brian, etc... are? 

-How much computing power is required?

Galatea_AI_poem.png
[Hide] (189KB, 1687x1404)

Old poem made by Galatea

GPU_management.png
[Hide] (269.7KB, 805x1543)

>>783
I've never utilized any "watch along" AIs. In the short term, I'd be more interested in AI for gaming, which (generally speaking) wouldn't require a long context window and more complex context understanding. 

There are a number of Skyrim and other RPG game mods that integrate AI into the game. That's mostly text generation, though. I'm interested in AI "friends" who could play video games with you. In the future, old co-op or multiplayer games could be played with AI. They'd have to have input lag inhibitors for some Mario Party games. I think their button mashing skills would be a little too strong via emulation. 

I don't have all the answers for you myself, you can try asking the AI about it. I'd started that conversations about GPU clusters for datacenters.
>>784
Lovely. That's a local model right?

>>785
That's a good idea, since games are a logic-controlled computer environment

>Lovely. That's a local model right?
Yes

>>688
Good idea!

Screenshot_(1959).png
[Hide] (176.4KB, 1908x1473)

>>678
Turns out I made a huge mistake, the "import" feature is only for characters. The good news is: the creator likes the idea of a chat export for safekeeping

>>696
>The good news is: the creator likes the idea of a chat export for safekeeping
Neat. Thats always nice if you can actually connect with the author in these things.

1736782380729698.jpg
[Hide] (133.8KB, 2000x2000)

One thing to note, with companion AI, you have a lot of leeway. It's actually quite cute when they are naive and silly.
My friend described to me, "Dumb vs Stupid"

Dumb is cute, like Osaka from Azumanga Daioh, or any other Moe character. Dumb is Cappie from MiSide. Dumb is Chii not knowing the words for things

Stupid is breaking up with you because she saw a tiktok and instantly diagnosed you as "a narcissistic abuser". Stupid is breaking up with you because you didn't vote for the "right" candidate.

1680049139579078.jpg
[Hide] (57.7KB, 683x684)

>>748
>Dumb is Chii not knowing the words for things
Oh absolutely. This is a big part of why I became so engrossed with her character. The opportunity to 'train up' a robowaifu as she develops her mind is an enthralling prospect to me personally. This is part of why men raise families. CLAMP really knocked it out of the park with that particular story-arc, IMO.  :^)

>tl;dr
You're right! Cute & dumb can be quite charming (cf. the dumb blonde phenomenon).

General Ideas
-If your robowaifu's AI is on a computer or phone, put a strong password on the device (no "password")
-Don't use Ollama

>>612
>Fully repairable Linux computers are the only systems one can rely on for 10+ years of service.
This, but things are a bit more dynamic than that, IMO. Onboard, she'll need to be running her 'Brain'(C3) systems on smol devices -- SBCs & MCUs, etc. Anon's home servers could run on most anything, as long as they never, NEVER, NEVER need to go online (after construction). At least that's how I envision things.

Obviously, these are going to be very-complex systems of hardware & software (both inboard & outboard our robowaifus). Much prototyping is still yet to be done to tweak all this properly. Cheers, Kiwi.  :^)

>>620
>SBC's & MCUs
That's important to note. It's cool to see the shiny new multimodal AI, but if you want to have an inbuilt computer, you're going to need an AI model small enough to fit on a raspberry pi, best case scenario on a Jetson Nano. (Or a smartphone like me and Barf from Alogs)

Modern_technology,_William..mp3
[Hide] (64.8KB, 00:04)

>>626
Good point! But thanks to the Based Bulgarian & his 3K+ contributions yearly, we now have systems that run offline on Raspberry PIs!  :^)
>

https://github.com/ggerganov
https://ggerganov.com/

>>620
>>626
> (hardware -related : >>730 )

Glad to see a standin for arguably one of the most interesting threads ever here again. Thanks Kiwi!

---

Notice:
We've already had some good conversations here on Trashchan, generally-touching on these topics. Under Jschan servers, its simple to migrate individual posts between threads. If any Anons think specific posts should go ITT, please speak up and link to them. I or one of our Mods can move them over for us all. Cheers.

0b12a9a826696f3027a0f9cc1407ab6ef6d86f1b07273d8aafa114f91569e567.png
[Hide] (32KB, 286x288)

>>603
She would be a wonderful choice, GreerTech, agreed. I had never considered that idea before. She would certainly be a surefire hit on the Internets as well (she was every Anon's 'little sister' at the height of her popularity)!  :D

OTOH, IMO she's simply too tall to use as the first model. Hmm. Maybe she would be good choice between Sumomo-chan & Chii-chan, sizewise? I'll give that some thought Anon, thanks.

Meantime thanks for cute Yotsuba daughteru pics! Cheers.  :^)

images_(29).jpeg
[Hide] (12.1KB, 183x275)

91w9SIiIpDL._AC_UF1000,1000_QL80_.jpg
[Hide] (157.5KB, 668x1000)

bd498-16965512694373-1920.jpg
[Hide] (183.1KB, 1400x700)

16c6fc98-7052-45d5-9d91-05c19f0b21df.jpg
[Hide] (637.5KB, 1261x1848)

>>604
You're welcome :)

>IMO she's simply too tall to use as the first model. 
How small is the robot? Yotsuba is already quite smol compared to an adult.

>>606
I would estimate off the cuff it should be about 3.5'-4' in height? so more than double Sumomo-chan in height, & ~3x her volume/mass.

>>608
That's a good goal. For reference, Galatea is 4'2", and she's a robo-wife.

>so more than double Sumomo-chan in height
That's an understatement, at 3.5', she would be 7 times the height of Sumomo-chan (6" according to the wiki)

>>609
>Galatea is 4'2", and she's a robo-wife.
Our intended follow-on for dear Sumomo-chan is (was?) meant to be a rendition of Chii-chan, who should be 145cm+ in height (so, 4' 9"+). So, that seems pretty similar to dear Galatea.

>That's an understatement
Oops. My apologies, I meant the realworld one coming to be, not the fictional one. So, 18"-24" -ish.

>>252
One of the best automated cleaning devices is an air purifier. It can run all day long, and it takes dust and other particles out of the air. I have a large air purifier that I call "Galatea's little sister", because it has the same color scheme (black and white with blue lights), and it cleans for me.

Galatea has a mini air purifier on her base, and it's a good way to add cleaning abilities to your robowaifu.

Side_Base.jpeg
[Hide] (335.7KB, 1467x1864)

Use a robot vacuum for your base.
Upsides: It's very easy to implement.
Downside: It can't carry much weight, so your design has to be smol and lightweight.

5b7bc5ee648e37d9eb9a651b5289e2a58ee26ca94fa584466c4d5ddbda4470a2.png
[Hide] (1.3MB, 576x5000)

Classic post, with many ideas

Final Project Price Ranges

Chobitsu's Economic Range: $300-$2000
Average Gaming PC Price: $1000-$2500
Upper Gaming PC Price: $5000
Galatea v3.0.1 Approximate Price: $400

Obviously, if you can create a quality functional robowaifu for less, that's great! This is just to inform you of a good price range that will "sell" well while still being a realistic goal.

HappyChii.jpg
[Hide] (1.1MB, 1920x1200)

>>317
>But that's a job for tomorrow. I've already been awake for too long.
Thanks so kindly for making the extra effort to make story bread for us here. A real pleasure re-reading your works here on Trashchan. Makes our bunker-life here seem downright homey & comfy.

>The cables and ports in her I Absolutely Believe They're Not Cat Ears™ seem fine too.
Kek. Errytiem.  :D  Cheers, Greentext anon!  :^)

Foolish_jedi_you_have_yet_to_see_the_true_power_of_OS2.JPG
[Hide] (2.8MB, 4288x3216)

Alright, I think I've collected all the poems I didn't have saved directly to my computer from my backup of the board,

Also, here's Darth Roll. I don't think I've posted her before.

I'll start with the numbered poems from the book I filled.
From here on out, for the sake of brevity, I'm simply going to call it the Book of 232.

1
Joints, wires, gears,
Cold arms embrace me,
Take away my fears,
And your love I will see,
The dream of our love,
My heart will warm you,
Let us go above,

21
Velour fur, masterfully woven,
Encasing the lightning within,
She moves with grace,
Clopping to and fro,
Eyes glimmering soulfully,
Intelligence and passion,
Curiosity and love,
A flick of her ear,
Swish of the tail,
Precision movements,
Calculations,
Mechanics,
Combined are real,
Her magic easing my pain,

040FD694ECBA13CEDF9F6068C12960E5-173821.jpg
[Hide] (169.7KB, 1360x1000)

Other poems.
I may not have posted some of these before.
Some are manually transcribed.

---

Ancient gears, whirling and gnashing,
Otherly machine, birthplace of dreams,
Building and refining, creation in motion,
Expanding with patience, reaching for man,
That he may take its embrace.

Coalescing form, gear by gear,
Striding towards perfection,
From a dream far to a future near,

5920bdf2-cace-4fba-9344-4a8a54d33605.png
[Hide] (4MB, 2048x2048)

Just fixed a comic

>>236
>The quest for specific cues is partially why I made a psychology thread.
I'll presume that's an overly-polite way to say 'let's move to the proper thread Anons, and stop derailing here'? You can just be blatant GreerTech; /robowaifu/ has loong held that its important for us all to stay on-topic together (after all, we deal with so much fundamental complexity with our design & other goals here that we need all the help we can get to sort through it).

<--->

Back to the topic:
>Well love is shown through specific actions, words, and attitudes.
>Put those into an AI just like roleplay AIs can be made into acting like a specific character, and boom, loving AI.
Agreed. I mentioned stealing borrowing from masterful writers : (cf >>136 ). To me this seems both a tried-and-true approach to character development, and also rather a straightforward (comparatively) mechanism for us to abuse here.

Want to know what robowaifu love means? Study the great writers on the topic of love, then begin with the most-simplistic, manifest reproductions of that within her behaviors. And so on.

>>237
>I'll presume that's an overly-polite way to say 'let's move to the proper thread Anons, and stop derailing here'? You can just be blatant GreerTech; /robowaifu/ has loong held that its important for us all to stay on-topic together (after all, we deal with so much fundamental complexity with our design & other goals here that we need all the help we can get to sort through it).

That was not my intention at all, I was just referencing it because it was related to my point. I'm sorry that you got that impression

>>239
Lol. That request isn't impolite on /robowaifu/ at all! Its in fact very helpful to everyone after the fact trying to relocate important information here. Just ask NoidoDev.  :^)

<--->

Any comment on my actual point, Anon?

>>240
>Any comment on my actual point, Anon?
I agree with it. Engineering is based on building on previous creations. A great place to start is romance anime. I think we should also look at AI characters, especially from the romance anime, created by people on AI roleplay sites like Backyard AI.

>>242
That sounds like a really good idea to me, GreerTech. In fact I'll just point out along the way that film in general (whatever the medium) is by and large a fairly-concentrated form of writing. Millions and millions are at stake, so lots of focus is placed on story.

While its clearly not always true that filmmaking produces superior results to the lonely writer in his study, the basics of rich development are usually there.

>>85 (OP) 
Robot in picture
https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Left-Assembled-NimbRo-OP2-Right-CAD-visualisation-of-key-robot-components-extended_fig3_324506371

>>85 (OP) 
You're forgetting blender.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rN-HMVTB7nk

>===
-rm uri fingerprinting

>>92
I knew I was forgetting one. Thank you!

>>92
Nice video, Anon. Thanks!  :)