>>2671
>I woodn't start to rebuild /late/ if they're just offline temporarily.
Ahh. Good point, BO. I suppose my desire for compassion towards them (remember, we had to bring our own board back from scratch too) is making me get ahead of myself.
>In the case /late/ is really dead, we may think about it seriously but I really want first to have some words with them.
Good thinking.
>If anyone can reach them (I see they have a discord but it seems dead to >>2650) and I don't use it myself and can gives update it wood be really appreciated.
Sorry I'm not your man, either. I personally refuse to use Doxxcord on moral grounds.
>keep the archives preciously as it may be useful
Will do. Just like the others, it's a part of our heritage that needs to endure.